Collateral Bloggage

What passes for thought around here…
Filed under bible, life

As I mentioned in my Monday Morning Musings this week, I’ve long suspected that exclaiming “Oh, my God!” does not constitute a violation of the 3rd Commandment, which states (in the NASB):

You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain, for the LORD will not leave him unpunished who takes His name in vain.

If not for the corpus of built-up interpretation that equates “OMG” with “taking the name in vain,” how might we view this?  By the way, check out the Message on this:

No using the name of GOD, your God, in curses or silly banter; GOD won’t put up with the irreverent use of his name.

Is this rendering even close to the real meaning?  I don’t really think so (not that I’m surprised…it is The Message, after all).  But, I didn’t want to be hasty, so I looked up the word translated “take” in Strong’s (courtesy NETBible).  Here’s what I got:

1) to lift, bear up, carry, take
1a1) to lift, lift up
1a2) to bear, carry, support, sustain, endure

So, take is in there. But in the context of the other definitions, it seems to mean more “take up” than “use.” So what’s it mean? Dennis Prager, a radio talk show host who also teaches Old Testament, has said on many occasions that it means, “committing evil while acting religious.”

Which justifies the thought I had back in the 80s, when David Duke (former-KKK-white-supremecist-pond-scum, the last adjective of which is totally redundant) said on national television, “I claim Jesus Christ as my personal savior,” that he was taking the name of Christ in vain.  Likewise for any who do evil in Christ’s name (Fred “God hates fags” Phelps, you there?) or in God’s name (Al Quaeda?).

All that to say that I don’t believe “misusing” God’s name is a specific violation of the 3rd Commandment.  But is it okay?  I personally flinch whenever I hear anything approaching “OMG,” which includes “Gosh”.  I once heard Ethan’s Sunday School teacher use it while doing the Bible Story of the day.  I wanted to throw something at her.  I don’t want my son using such language.  Am I overreacting?

And yet, you’ll catch me saying “Geez!”  What?  How about, “Oh, my word!” or “My goodness!”?  Aren’t they all derivatives?  How about “Crikey!” and “Cripes!” and “For Pete’s Sake!”?  How far do I take this?

Here’s another angle.  How about if you put your husband/wife into the position of God in the statement.  What would people think if you said, “Oh my wife, it’s hot out here?”  Isn’t it a bit silly?  Does using her in that kind of speech lift her up or cheapen her?  Not sure you could argue the former.

What about darn, dang, and drat?  Why not just go with damn?  Aren’t they the same?  While researching the various varieties of variations, I discovered the term “minced oaths” from Wikipedia, the locus of all knowledge we take other people’s word for (BTW, that link contains some naughty language).

I guess, for me, even though I don’t think many of these are specifically forbidden for Christian folks to do, they’re not a good thing.  Any of them.  Specifically, the uses of “OMG” and it’s forms.  They’ve been so long associated with “taking the name in vain” - even in popular (secular) culture - that they now rise to that level.  As Christians, we should try to move as far from that as possible.  As for some of the minced oaths, I can see it two ways.  To be completely consistent, we’d have to nix all of them.  On the other hand, it shows a certain innocence to stay away from the more crass terms and use something “nicer” (even if it really isn’t nicer).  That alone could be the thing someone notices, which causes them to ask you what makes you different.

I’m curious about others’ opinions on this.  If you use OMG (or OMGosh), is it just habit?  Do you think it’s good/bad/indifferent?  Now you have a topic.  Discuss…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Posted by Seth on Thursday, August 7th, 2008


You can follow any responses to this entry through the magic of "RSS 2.0" and leave a trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Theology Thursday: Carrying the Name”

Post A Comment